top of page

Choke Point: Errors

Sep 29
2 min read

Errors are systemic.  And that's why they're systemically preventable. 


But the cost isn't just some rework; a substantial portion of most organizations exists just to deal with errors.


And it's not just a cost problem; it's a capacity problem. 


Every error creates work that wasn't in the plan. Rework, re-inspection, re-setup, re-order (with overnight expedite), injuries, broken machines, scrap replacement, the extra changeover to go back and fix a run.


None of it adds value, and all of it takes people, machines, and hours away from the work that does.


That's where the Error Spiral starts.


Rework eats capacity → the schedule falls behind → people rush to catch up → rushing creates more errors → more rework eats more capacity.


Run that loop long enough and the organization reshapes itself around it. Whole departments exist to catch, sort, and repair what went wrong. Much of middle management exists to replan around the fallout: expediting, rescheduling, chasing shortages, managing overtime, explaining misses.


Nobody designed it that way. It grew one reasonable fix at a time.


Now picture your plant with every process followed the way it's written. How many roles would still be needed? How many meetings? How many "hot" orders?


How much simpler would it be?


In most plants, that comparison is uncomfortable. Only a fraction of the organization is actually producing. The rest is there to absorb the Error Spiral and clean up after it.


That's why you can't buy your way out. More people and more capacity without fixing the core issues just gives the errors more room to compound.


The lever is prevention. Every error stopped at the source gives back the capacity it would have consumed, plus the capacity of every error it would have caused downstream, plus the organizational weight built to manage it.


If every process in your plant ran as written tomorrow, how much of your organization would you still need?


Comments


bottom of page