Most manufacturers implement Lean too early. And it costs them. If you need to improve now, do not implement Lean. When a plant is under pressure to improve, the instinct is to reach for Lean. Kaizen events. Value stream mapping. 5S blitzes. It looks like action. It feels like progress. But plants that are under pressure to improve have something in common: they always have known problems they aren't solving. And if you have problems you aren't successfully solving, the pro

Every organization runs on 4 levels of work. Technical. Tactical. Operational. Strategic. Technical - does the work in accordance with process. Tactical - ensures the work is done in accordance with process. Operational - writes the process. Strategic - wields the entire organization. Each level has the same 3 core systems: Daily operations - do what needs to be done (planning and execution) Process improvement - learn from feedback, improve the standard. Accountability

Most leaders think about errors one at a time. One mistake → one fix. Done. But that's not how it works on the plant floor or anywhere else people execute complex work under pressure. Every error you DON'T prevent creates the conditions for many more. Here's how: A team member skips a verification step. The product gets made wrong. Now you have rework. Rework eats time, disrupts the schedule, and puts people in a state of rushing. Maybe not just your facility, maybe materials

I keep seeing leaders throw "culture" at broken operations like it's a cure instead of a symptom. Ping-pong tables. Core values on the wall. Town halls about trust. And nothing changes. Here's the truth: you cannot build a bad organization with a great culture, and you cannot fix a bad organization by working on culture. Culture isn't a lever. It's feedback. There's an old story. The Sun and the Wind are arguing over who can get a farmer to take off his jacket. The Wind goes

I recently received a DM asking what 180 OPEX actually does. We fix process compliance problems. So what's a process compliance problem? That's when habits, convenience, distraction or disinterest at any level derail success because your team isn't in full alignment with your process. Now, there are really 3 ways to be out of alignment with the process: 1) Complacency - We don't follow the process because we don't think it's important (or it's inconvenient and nobody cares

Lean is irrelevant to your operation right now. Not because it doesn't work. But because if you keep having the same problems, which is where most of industry lives, you have a control problem. And Lean doesn't fix control problems. It hides them. Here's what a control problem looks like: An operator puts the wrong date/label/product/lid/quantity on the wrong box/pallet/product, and now you're scrapping, reworking, or apologizing your way out of another disaster. This happe

You're Just Not Running It Right. Games aren't fun because they're games. That sounds backward, so let me say it plainly: there is nothing inherently enjoyable about jumping on a mushroom or chasing an oblong leather ball. What makes games fun is that they simulate things we're already driven to experience: status, mastery, belonging, discovery, completion. Yu-kai Chou spent years mapping this out in a framework called Octalysis, which identifies eight core human motivation

Everyone in industry knows Deming's line: "A bad system beats a good person every time." It's true. Systems make success. But systems require a foundation. Without it, they don't work. We can prove this experimentally. Lean is one of the greatest system-building tools ever conceived. And it fails the vast majority of the time. The statistics are clear and supported by thousands of iterations. Why does it fail? Ask the Lean practitioners and they'll tell you: leadership. But i

And why the difference between the two always compounds Every plant manager has watched it happen. A changeover gets rushed at the start of second shift. The operator swaps the change parts but doesn't verify something critical. Maybe it's a standard that's been written down, maybe it's not. The line runs for forty minutes before someone notices there's something wrong (bottles dented, labels crooked, wrong materials, wrong print, etc). Now there's a quality hold, a financial

"A bad system will beat a good person every time." - Deming We've all seen the stats, they're clear: 70–90% of Lean, Six Sigma, and TPM implementations fail. The process excellence community's explanation: Leadership. "Superficial commitment." "Treats lean as a toolbox, not a culture." "Weak supervisors." "Doesn't give the floor a voice." The objective function is: We said do this and it didn't happen. It must be the leader's fault. But we already know that weak operational s

Most organizations don't have a training system or an accountability system. They have training events and they have punishment events. And, statistically speaking, neither training nor punishment events are very effective. Here's how punishment events work in practice: Wait for disaster. Trace it back to where a standard wasn't followed. Punish to deter recurrence. Nobody was checking that standard before the disaster which is why it happened in the first place. The system o

Hand a team a mission with no planning and everything except the desired end-state becomes an unknown. Under those conditions, Hofstadter’s Law rules: “It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter’s Law.” Every unclear step, hidden risk, surprise need, and mismatched expectation lands squarely in the gap you left, which causes performance to suffer. Leaders who issue jobs like this live in perpetual disappointment because every single job

"In any bureaucratic organization, there will be two kinds of people: those committed to the mission of the organization, and those committed to the organization itself. In time, the dedicated protectors of the organization will always gain control of it, and the actual purpose of the organization will be lost." In a merit-based system, we naturally promote those who appear most competent or, phrased differently, those who are least incompetent. On the surface, this makes per

Ever go into a meeting and see a Pareto Chart that is linear? Or maybe there is a slight rise at the top... but clearly it's not in accordance with the Pareto Principle? Pareto Principle: Also known as the 80/20 rule, it states that roughly 80% of effects come from 20% of causes—in ops, 80% of downtime might stem from 20% of factors. This one is essential for setting priorities in a leadership role. When leading change, the temptation is to pull the most easily accessible dat

Imagine a state where time seems to slow down, distractions fade away, and every action feels effortless and precise. This is "flow," a psychological concept coined by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, describing optimal immersion where challenges perfectly match skills, leading to heightened focus, intrinsic motivation, and superior performance. In flow, decision-making is automatic and subconscious. Movement is precise and efficient. People become superhuman in their ability to perf

Ever watched a Little-League team completely forget how to play baseball after the coach yells at a player? Humphrey's Law: Conscious attention to a task normally performed automatically can impair its performance, deliberate focus disrupts ingrained habits, spiking error rates. This one is essential for process leaders. People's highest performance physical capabilities occur when they run on autopilot. That's what muscle and movement memories are. Under muscle memory, peopl

Centralizing decisions because of "incorrect" or "bad" decision making causes bottlenecks and slows your entire operation to a crawl while frontline teams wait for approvals. Ashby's Law: Only variety can absorb variety. To effectively control a complex system, the controller must have at least as much flexibility (variety) as the system it's managing; otherwise, it gets overwhelmed. This one is essential for correctly integrating decision making into systems. When someone on

Source: xkcd.com New tasks with unknowns over-run estimates no matter how much buffer you build-in. Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law." This law really highlights the risk of running any task outside the control of a clear process. To be clear, in a well-designed, trained, and controlled process you will find tasks are repeatable and predictable. When you design process, you design every step to minimiz

Have you noticed how much better a team's processes look on audit day? If we can run the way we're supposed to on audit day, why can't we just do it right every day? Pearson's Law: "When performance is measured, performance improves. When performance is measured and reported back, the rate of improvement accelerates." This one is critical in maintaining any systemic function of a team. If it needs to happen, someone needs to be checking. If you want that process followed dili

Have you ever been in a meeting with a "slick" manager who could conveniently explain how every problem originated outside his department? You start to wonder why nobody calls him out for it. Brandolini's Law: "The amount of energy needed to refute "BS" is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it." In practice, a "bad actor" can make statements quite easily which a "good faith actor" can't work fast enough to refute. By being genuine, the "good faith actors