Bad Systems Beat Good Leaders
- Mac Davis

- May 6
- 2 min read
Updated: Jun 5
"A bad system will beat a good person every time." - Deming
We've all seen the stats, they're clear: 70–90% of Lean, Six Sigma, and TPM implementations fail.
The process excellence community's explanation: Leadership.
"Superficial commitment." "Treats lean as a toolbox, not a culture." "Weak supervisors." "Doesn't give the floor a voice."
The objective function is: We said do this and it didn't happen. It must be the leader's fault.
But we already know that weak operational systems beat good operators.
Why would we expect anything different when we load a lean implementation as "extra work" onto an already-overloaded leader?
Leaders are people. Are they being beaten by a bad system?
Training and accountability, the two cornerstones of any change effort, work exactly the same way. Tell people what you want. Check. Then check again. Repetition is the magic bullet that makes it work. The research is clear. That's how behavior changes. Training and accountability go together, it's a single system - but one that becomes very complex at scale.
So what system are we actually providing that helps leaders do that at scale, across hundreds or thousands of individual behaviors, in a plant that's still on fire?
Most of us hand them a checklist and call it Leader Standard Work. I've seen a lot of LSW. It's not built for the complexity of the job.
Those leaders can't handle the complexity or the extra work, even with a checklist. They're buried. They aren't failing for lack of effort.
If our bad system is beating their good leaders, it's on us to provide the system that makes it work.
The absence of an integrated training and accountability system built for the complexity of a factory is why it fails.
That's what 180 OPEX exists to solve.
Most leaders aren't failing because they lack effort, commitment, or capability.
They're operating inside systems that make consistent execution difficult to sustain.
Improving performance isn't just about developing better leaders. It's about building operational systems that help good leaders succeed.





Comments