I was new to the factory. The day I showed up I found out the plant was in danger of being closed. Division published a plan for "plant consolidation"... and we were the bottom performer. They didn't mention that in the interview. My department had four maintenance techs. One on each shift. 24/7 coverage. And they were good. They knew their trades. We always had someone there for emergencies, but we never had enough people there to compete with emergencies. Every schedul

A core function approach to eliminating maintenance reactivity. Walk into almost any industrial facility and ask the maintenance manager how things are going. You will hear some version of the same answer: "We're getting killed and everyone is mad at us.”
 It's typically not a laziness or staffing problem. It's usually an organizational issue and sometimes a matter of technical knowledge. But it's fixable.
 Running maintenance is like driving through a forest. It's easier

Hiring a maintenance planner can set a maintenance shop back. I see it too often. As soon as a planner is hired, techs stop making parts lists. Because that's planning, and they want support. Techs are overworked. They want a planner so they can stop doing paperwork and get back to the floor. That's how it should be... right? Nope. If you're doing it that way, you're better off without the planner. Making parts lists... that's not a planner. That's a very expensive assista